Review



interference of crispr edits analysis v3 tool  (Synthego Inc)

 
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 90

    Structured Review

    Synthego Inc interference of crispr edits analysis v3 tool
    Interference Of Crispr Edits Analysis V3 Tool, supplied by Synthego Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/interference+of+crispr+edits+analysis+tool/ice+crispr+analysis+tool/pm40653915-433-7-7
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    interference of crispr edits analysis v3 tool - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    90/100 stars

    Images

    Related Articles

    Polymerase Chain Reaction:

    Article Title: TIGIT blockade in the context of BCMA-CART cell therapy does not augment efficacy in a multiple myeloma mouse model
    Article Snippet: DNA was extracted from TIGIT KO CAR-T cells and wild type (WT) CAR-T cells to evaluate KO efficiency using a DNeasy kit (Qiagen). .. After polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification, purified products were sequenced, and results were analyzed using the Interference of CRISPR Edits Analysis Tool (Synthego), using WT-ARI0002h as control. ..

    Amplification:

    Article Title: TIGIT blockade in the context of BCMA-CART cell therapy does not augment efficacy in a multiple myeloma mouse model
    Article Snippet: DNA was extracted from TIGIT KO CAR-T cells and wild type (WT) CAR-T cells to evaluate KO efficiency using a DNeasy kit (Qiagen). .. After polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification, purified products were sequenced, and results were analyzed using the Interference of CRISPR Edits Analysis Tool (Synthego), using WT-ARI0002h as control. ..

    Purification:

    Article Title: TIGIT blockade in the context of BCMA-CART cell therapy does not augment efficacy in a multiple myeloma mouse model
    Article Snippet: DNA was extracted from TIGIT KO CAR-T cells and wild type (WT) CAR-T cells to evaluate KO efficiency using a DNeasy kit (Qiagen). .. After polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification, purified products were sequenced, and results were analyzed using the Interference of CRISPR Edits Analysis Tool (Synthego), using WT-ARI0002h as control. ..

    CRISPR:

    Article Title: TIGIT blockade in the context of BCMA-CART cell therapy does not augment efficacy in a multiple myeloma mouse model
    Article Snippet: DNA was extracted from TIGIT KO CAR-T cells and wild type (WT) CAR-T cells to evaluate KO efficiency using a DNeasy kit (Qiagen). .. After polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification, purified products were sequenced, and results were analyzed using the Interference of CRISPR Edits Analysis Tool (Synthego), using WT-ARI0002h as control. ..

    Control:

    Article Title: TIGIT blockade in the context of BCMA-CART cell therapy does not augment efficacy in a multiple myeloma mouse model
    Article Snippet: DNA was extracted from TIGIT KO CAR-T cells and wild type (WT) CAR-T cells to evaluate KO efficiency using a DNeasy kit (Qiagen). .. After polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification, purified products were sequenced, and results were analyzed using the Interference of CRISPR Edits Analysis Tool (Synthego), using WT-ARI0002h as control. ..



    Similar Products

    90
    Synthego Inc interference of crispr edits analysis v3 tool
    Interference Of Crispr Edits Analysis V3 Tool, supplied by Synthego Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/interference+of+crispr+edits+analysis+tool/ice+crispr+analysis+tool/pm40653915-433-7-7
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    interference of crispr edits analysis v3 tool - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Synthego Inc interference of crispr edits analysis tool
    Interference Of Crispr Edits Analysis Tool, supplied by Synthego Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/interference+of+crispr+edits+analysis+tool/ice+crispr+analysis+tool/10__1080_slash_2162402x__2025__2529632-61-18-22
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    interference of crispr edits analysis tool - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Synthego Inc interference of crispr edits (ice) analysis tool
    Targeted DNA modification in cells treated with VSV-G-pseudotyped <t>CRISPR-Cas9/sgRNA-loaded</t> LVNPs (A) Plasmids used for production of LVNPs. Plasmids are co-transfected into HEK293T producer cells using the calcium phosphate method. Donut diagram shows the amounts of the different plasmids used in a transfection for the production of VSV-G-pseudotyped LVNPs. (B) 8 × 10 4 HEK293T cells were treated with increasing dosages of VSV-G-pseudotyped LVNPs targeting AFF1 or HEK3. Indel rates were determined 3 days after transduction ( n = 3 technical replicates). (C) 8 × 10 4 HEK293T cells were treated with increasing dosages of VSV-G-pseudotyped LVNPs targeting B2M . KO rates were determined by flow cytometry after 7 days using an anti-B2M-PE antibody ( n = 3 technical replicates). (D) Indel rates determined 3 days after treating 1 × 10 5 SupT1 cells with increasing dosages of VSV-G-pseudotyped LVNPs targeting AFF1 or HEK3 ( n = 2 technical replicates). (E) 1 × 10 5 SupT1 cells were treated with increasing dosages of VSV-G-pseudotyped LVNPs targeting B2M . KO rates were determined by flow cytometry after 7 days using an anti-B2M-PE antibody ( n = 2 technical replicates). Data are presented as mean (SD). Indel rates were determined by <t>ICE</t> analysis.
    Interference Of Crispr Edits (Ice) Analysis Tool, supplied by Synthego Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/interference+of+crispr+edits+analysis+tool/inference+of+crispr+edits++ice+/pmc11426049-308-7-4
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    interference of crispr edits (ice) analysis tool - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Targeted DNA modification in cells treated with VSV-G-pseudotyped CRISPR-Cas9/sgRNA-loaded LVNPs (A) Plasmids used for production of LVNPs. Plasmids are co-transfected into HEK293T producer cells using the calcium phosphate method. Donut diagram shows the amounts of the different plasmids used in a transfection for the production of VSV-G-pseudotyped LVNPs. (B) 8 × 10 4 HEK293T cells were treated with increasing dosages of VSV-G-pseudotyped LVNPs targeting AFF1 or HEK3. Indel rates were determined 3 days after transduction ( n = 3 technical replicates). (C) 8 × 10 4 HEK293T cells were treated with increasing dosages of VSV-G-pseudotyped LVNPs targeting B2M . KO rates were determined by flow cytometry after 7 days using an anti-B2M-PE antibody ( n = 3 technical replicates). (D) Indel rates determined 3 days after treating 1 × 10 5 SupT1 cells with increasing dosages of VSV-G-pseudotyped LVNPs targeting AFF1 or HEK3 ( n = 2 technical replicates). (E) 1 × 10 5 SupT1 cells were treated with increasing dosages of VSV-G-pseudotyped LVNPs targeting B2M . KO rates were determined by flow cytometry after 7 days using an anti-B2M-PE antibody ( n = 2 technical replicates). Data are presented as mean (SD). Indel rates were determined by ICE analysis.

    Journal: Molecular Therapy. Nucleic Acids

    Article Title: Cell-targeted gene modification by delivery of CRISPR-Cas9 ribonucleoprotein complexes in pseudotyped lentivirus-derived nanoparticles

    doi: 10.1016/j.omtn.2024.102318

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Targeted DNA modification in cells treated with VSV-G-pseudotyped CRISPR-Cas9/sgRNA-loaded LVNPs (A) Plasmids used for production of LVNPs. Plasmids are co-transfected into HEK293T producer cells using the calcium phosphate method. Donut diagram shows the amounts of the different plasmids used in a transfection for the production of VSV-G-pseudotyped LVNPs. (B) 8 × 10 4 HEK293T cells were treated with increasing dosages of VSV-G-pseudotyped LVNPs targeting AFF1 or HEK3. Indel rates were determined 3 days after transduction ( n = 3 technical replicates). (C) 8 × 10 4 HEK293T cells were treated with increasing dosages of VSV-G-pseudotyped LVNPs targeting B2M . KO rates were determined by flow cytometry after 7 days using an anti-B2M-PE antibody ( n = 3 technical replicates). (D) Indel rates determined 3 days after treating 1 × 10 5 SupT1 cells with increasing dosages of VSV-G-pseudotyped LVNPs targeting AFF1 or HEK3 ( n = 2 technical replicates). (E) 1 × 10 5 SupT1 cells were treated with increasing dosages of VSV-G-pseudotyped LVNPs targeting B2M . KO rates were determined by flow cytometry after 7 days using an anti-B2M-PE antibody ( n = 2 technical replicates). Data are presented as mean (SD). Indel rates were determined by ICE analysis.

    Article Snippet: Indels were analyzed using Synthego’s Interference of CRISPR Edits (ICE) analysis tool.

    Techniques: Modification, CRISPR, Transfection, Transduction, Flow Cytometry

    MV-H/F and MV-H/F-SLAM pseudotyping of CRISPR-Cas9/sgRNA-containing LVNPs allows for cell- and gene-targeted DNA cleavage in primary B cells (A) The workflow for transduction of primary B cells. In half of the experiments, B cells were stimulated by IL-4 and IL-21. (B) Representative B cell profiles at day 6 (donor 1). (C) Representative SLAM expression levels measured by flow cytometry after 3 days of stimulation. CD20 staining was used to discriminate between B cells and feeder cells (donor 1). (D) CD40L stimulation resulted in upregulation of SLAM. Black and gray columns show the MFI and the percentage of SLAM + cells, respectively ( n = 3 biological replicates, donors 1 + 2). (E) Further stimulation with IL-4 and IL-21 resulted in higher MFI, translating to higher levels of SLAM on the cell surface ( n = 3 biological replicates, donors 1 + 2). Columns colors as in (D). (F) Pseudotyped LV-mediated EGFP gene transfer in B cells. 5 × 10 4 B cells were seeded on 5 × 10 4 feeder cells. B cells were transduced at an MOI of 5 IU/cell ( n = 3 biological replicates, donors 1–3). (G) Gene transfer in B cells after IL-4 and IL-21 stimulation. B cells were transduced at an MOI of 5 IU/cell ( n = 3 biological replicates, donors 1–3). (H) Indel analysis in B cells after treating 5 × 10 4 B cells with 500 ng p24 pseudotyped LVNPs targeting AFF1 ( n = 3 biological replicates, donors 1 + 2). (I) Stimulation with IL-4 and IL-21 resulted in increased gene modification in B cells treated with MV-H/F- and especially MV-H/F-SLAM-pseudotyped LVNPs ( n = 3 biological replicates, donors 1 + 2). Data are presented as mean (SD). Indel rates were determined by ICE analysis.

    Journal: Molecular Therapy. Nucleic Acids

    Article Title: Cell-targeted gene modification by delivery of CRISPR-Cas9 ribonucleoprotein complexes in pseudotyped lentivirus-derived nanoparticles

    doi: 10.1016/j.omtn.2024.102318

    Figure Lengend Snippet: MV-H/F and MV-H/F-SLAM pseudotyping of CRISPR-Cas9/sgRNA-containing LVNPs allows for cell- and gene-targeted DNA cleavage in primary B cells (A) The workflow for transduction of primary B cells. In half of the experiments, B cells were stimulated by IL-4 and IL-21. (B) Representative B cell profiles at day 6 (donor 1). (C) Representative SLAM expression levels measured by flow cytometry after 3 days of stimulation. CD20 staining was used to discriminate between B cells and feeder cells (donor 1). (D) CD40L stimulation resulted in upregulation of SLAM. Black and gray columns show the MFI and the percentage of SLAM + cells, respectively ( n = 3 biological replicates, donors 1 + 2). (E) Further stimulation with IL-4 and IL-21 resulted in higher MFI, translating to higher levels of SLAM on the cell surface ( n = 3 biological replicates, donors 1 + 2). Columns colors as in (D). (F) Pseudotyped LV-mediated EGFP gene transfer in B cells. 5 × 10 4 B cells were seeded on 5 × 10 4 feeder cells. B cells were transduced at an MOI of 5 IU/cell ( n = 3 biological replicates, donors 1–3). (G) Gene transfer in B cells after IL-4 and IL-21 stimulation. B cells were transduced at an MOI of 5 IU/cell ( n = 3 biological replicates, donors 1–3). (H) Indel analysis in B cells after treating 5 × 10 4 B cells with 500 ng p24 pseudotyped LVNPs targeting AFF1 ( n = 3 biological replicates, donors 1 + 2). (I) Stimulation with IL-4 and IL-21 resulted in increased gene modification in B cells treated with MV-H/F- and especially MV-H/F-SLAM-pseudotyped LVNPs ( n = 3 biological replicates, donors 1 + 2). Data are presented as mean (SD). Indel rates were determined by ICE analysis.

    Article Snippet: Indels were analyzed using Synthego’s Interference of CRISPR Edits (ICE) analysis tool.

    Techniques: CRISPR, Transduction, Expressing, Flow Cytometry, Staining, Modification